lichess.org
Donate

Help(computer analysis)

Here's an alternative analysis, only performed for white (you) with a different engine (full details of analysis settings in the PGN notes):

[Event "Rated game"]
[Site "lichess.org/wOWoTjik"]
[Date "2014.07.18"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Souvik"]
[Black "clevereduardo"]
[Result "0-1"]
[Annotator "Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC"]
[BlackElo "1640"]
[ECO "B02"]
[EventDate "2014.07.18"]
[Notes "Analysed moves 5 to 49 for white. Moves 1 to 4 in book, moves from 49 onward in endgame tables, average 30 seconds per move (more than the game itself)."]
[Opening "Alekhine Defense, Scandinavian Variation"]
[TimeControl "300+4"]
[Variant "Standard"]
[WhiteElo "1624"]

1.e4 Nf6 2.Nc3 d5 3.exd5 Nxd5 4.Nxd5 Qxd5 5.Nf3 Nc6 6.d4 Bg4 7.Be3 $6 { Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC:-0.33/21 } ( 7.Be2 { Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC:0.00/20 } 7...O-O-O 8.O-O Nxd4 9.Nxd4 Bxe2 10.Qxe2 Qxd4 11.Bg5 Qc5 12.Qg4+ Rd7 13.Rfd1 Qc6 14.c4 f6 15.Be3 a6 16.Rxd7 Qxd7 17.Qh5 g6 18.Qc5 b6 19.Qa3 Kb7 ) 7...O-O-O 8.c3 e5 9.dxe5 Bxf3 10.Qxf3 Nxe5 11.Qxd5 Rxd5 12.Be2 Nd3+ 13.Bxd3 Rxd3 14.O-O $2 { Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC:0.00/23 } ( 14.Bd4 { Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC:+1.04/24 } 14...c5 15.Ke2 c4 16.b3 b5 17.bxc4 bxc4 18.Rad1 Rxd1 19.Rxd1 a6 20.Be3 f5 21.Rd4 Be7 22.Rxc4+ Kb7 23.Rd4 Bf6 24.Rd5 Bxc3 25.Rxf5 Re8 ) 14...Be7 15.Bd4 Bf6 16.Bxf6 gxf6 17.Rfe1 Rd2 18.Rab1 Rg8 19.Re7 Rg7 20.g3 f5 21.Kf1 f4 22.Ke1 Rd6 23.Rd1 fxg3 24.fxg3 Re6+ 25.Rxe6 fxe6 26.Rd2 Rd7 27.Re2 Rd6 28.b4 $6 { Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC:0.00/24 } ( 28.Re4 { Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC:+0.35/23 } 28...Ra6 29.a4 Ra5 30.g4 Kd7 31.Ke2 Kd6 32.h4 b5 33.axb5 Rxb5 34.b4 c5 35.g5 cxb4 ) 28...Kd7 29.c4 $6 { Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC:-0.28/23 } ( 29.g4 { Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC:0.00/21 } 29...Rd5 30.Re3 Kd6 31.Rg3 b5 32.Ke2 c5 33.Rh3 Rg5 34.Kf3 Rg7 35.Rh6 cxb4 36.cxb4 Kd5 ) 29...Rd4 30.Rd2 e5 31.Rxd4+ exd4 32.Kd2 Ke6 33.Kd3 Ke5 34.a4 $4 { Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC:-3.21/24 } ( 34.c5 { Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC:0.00/25 } 34...Kd5 35.g4 a5 36.h4 axb4 37.g5 Ke5 38.h5 Kf5 39.g6 hxg6 40.hxg6 Kxg6 41.Kxd4 Kf6 42.Kc4 b6 43.Kxb4 bxc5+ 44.Kxc5 ) 34...b6 35.h3 $4 { Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC:-12.03/25 } ( 35.b5 { Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC:+3.26/27 } 35...h6 36.h3 h5 37.g4 h4 38.g5 Kf5 39.Kxd4 Kxg5 40.Ke5 Kg6 41.Kf4 Kh5 42.Kf5 Kh6 43.Kg4 Kg7 44.Kxh4 Kg6 45.Kg4 Kf6 46.h4 ) 35...c5 36.bxc5 bxc5 37.g4 h6 38.h4 a5 39.g5 hxg5 40.hxg5 Kf5 41.g6 Kxg6 42.Kd2 Kf5 43.Kd3 Kf4 44.Ke2 Ke4 45.Kd2 d3 46.Kd1 Ke3 47.Ke1 d2+ 48.Kd1 Kd4 49.Kxd2 Kxc4 50.Kc2 Kb4 51.Kb2 Kxa4 52.Kc3 Kb5 53.Kb3 a4+ 54.Kc3 c4 55.Kb2 Kb4 56.Kc2 c3 57.Kb1 Kb3 58.Kc1 a3 59.Kb1 c2+ 60.Kc1 a2 0-1

Short version: move 7 was an "oops", move 14 was "meh", move 28 was another "meh, could be better", move 29 was an "oops", move 34 was "uh-oh, you're on the ropes" and move 35 was "nope, you're utterly screwed."
<<
Short version: move 7 was an "oops", move 14 was "meh", move 28 was another "meh, could be better", move 29 was an "oops", move 34 was "uh-oh, you're on the ropes" and move 35 was "nope, you're utterly screwed."
>>

good analysis but white was winning at one point, just one mistake changed it all.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.