@ddfjdfjh said in #60:
> anyway it is a suprising that there is not any scepticism for those who believe in evolution or creation...
The evidence is quite compelling for evolution. There are very few in science that dont accept evolution, but those often have degrees in any field but astrophysics, geology, paleontology ir any sciences that study biology.
And from the vast majority of scientifics that are actually believers that are in any of those fields i just mentioned, while they remain believers for personal reasons, they mostly support evolution, the big bang and the old earth.
How do they resolve the conflicts? Who knows? But they know the young earth and creation are wrong.
> evolutionists said that universe is about 5 billion years old,
No sir. Evolutionary theory, as i stated many times before, does not speak about cosmic events. Astrophysicist say that the universe is just about 14 billion years old.
> Earth about 2,5 billion years old
More like 4.5 billions, but thats Geologist claiming that, not evolutionists.
>and mankind about 3 million years...
modern humans about 200 000 years, and thats a claim by yeah, paleontology, biology, genomists and other disciplines that yes, are more akin to the study of life and biodiversity.
> creationists saying, based on Bible - Earth is about 7500-8000 years old, creation scientists say Earth can't be older than 10 000 years...
There are trees older than that. Thats why very few actually believe in a young earth.
There is no such thing as a "creation scientist". Creation is not a field of study.
> but it is their research, not of those who read what they conclude or saw and hear their work and opinion. i think everyone should be sceptic about anything, if you are not in school and had to learn what is in books, you must be sceptic on anyone thought...
Remain skeptic is the only decent comment you have made, which is true. You must remain skeptic of any claim until they have enough evidence to back that up. Yet, you are a theist, and still refusing to watch the damm videos that explain why evolution theory works as an explanation.
You are not practicing skepticism on the side that has no evidence, and refuse to watch the very robust body of evidence that evolutionist have. Wtf dude. Be consistent.
> anyway it is a suprising that there is not any scepticism for those who believe in evolution or creation...
The evidence is quite compelling for evolution. There are very few in science that dont accept evolution, but those often have degrees in any field but astrophysics, geology, paleontology ir any sciences that study biology.
And from the vast majority of scientifics that are actually believers that are in any of those fields i just mentioned, while they remain believers for personal reasons, they mostly support evolution, the big bang and the old earth.
How do they resolve the conflicts? Who knows? But they know the young earth and creation are wrong.
> evolutionists said that universe is about 5 billion years old,
No sir. Evolutionary theory, as i stated many times before, does not speak about cosmic events. Astrophysicist say that the universe is just about 14 billion years old.
> Earth about 2,5 billion years old
More like 4.5 billions, but thats Geologist claiming that, not evolutionists.
>and mankind about 3 million years...
modern humans about 200 000 years, and thats a claim by yeah, paleontology, biology, genomists and other disciplines that yes, are more akin to the study of life and biodiversity.
> creationists saying, based on Bible - Earth is about 7500-8000 years old, creation scientists say Earth can't be older than 10 000 years...
There are trees older than that. Thats why very few actually believe in a young earth.
There is no such thing as a "creation scientist". Creation is not a field of study.
> but it is their research, not of those who read what they conclude or saw and hear their work and opinion. i think everyone should be sceptic about anything, if you are not in school and had to learn what is in books, you must be sceptic on anyone thought...
Remain skeptic is the only decent comment you have made, which is true. You must remain skeptic of any claim until they have enough evidence to back that up. Yet, you are a theist, and still refusing to watch the damm videos that explain why evolution theory works as an explanation.
You are not practicing skepticism on the side that has no evidence, and refuse to watch the very robust body of evidence that evolutionist have. Wtf dude. Be consistent.