lichess.org
Donate

How to Analyze Your Games

Albert Einstein was once quoted for stating the idea that one cannot make the same mistakes and expect different results. In order to become a better chess player, it is vital for you to analyze your past games, and learn from your past mistakes. Sometimes an idea may have worked, and should thus be repeated in the future. Other times, it is important to re-evaluate a former idea, and modify it for future use. Regardless, analyzing your past games can indicate to you where you need to focus to improve in the future.

Most people analyze their games briefly, merely focusing on the one mistake that caused their downfall in the game, and then moving on to the next game. However, it is paramount that you instead dissect the game, and break it down for future use. There are many ways to go about doing this, however, I recommend doing so in a systematic way.

1) Find your opening mistakes. You may have not made any, and it might have been your opponent that misstepped. However, make sure you understand the best way to go about refuting this misstep for future reference. You would be surprised at the number of people who often make a similar mistake in similar positions.

2) Target your strategic flaws. After the opening, it is important to develop a plan, and seek to implement this plan. Write down what your plan was, and see if you were able to implement it. What stopped you? Did you ignore your opponent's plan? The strategic part of the game is often very significant in determining who obtains an advantage. I would suggest studying games of strong players in similar positions to understand how best to play in the future.

3) Drill your tactical flaws. You may have not had any, but if you did it is paramount to avoid making the same mistakes. Stop blaming time pressure for tactical mistakes. GMs and IMs can still maintain a high quality of play even at this point. I would suggest finding what type of tactical mistakes you made, and drilling that particular type of tactic to perfection. An excellent software for doing this is CT-ART (the newest one preferably).

4) Understand your endgame weaknesses. There are many great endgame resources out there, among the best are chesstempo.com and Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual. What kind of endgame did you get into? Rook and pawn, queen and pawn, two pieces versus rook? There are many resources to drill such types of endgames to strengthen your weaknesses in this regard.

I have provided an example of one of my own games that I played online (Yes, I lost). It was an incredible learning experience, and even though time played a major factor in my defeat, I was able to learn a significant amount from my weaknesses in this game.

http://en.lichess.org/Cj5U8qyH/white
Since I have not yet figured out how to comment with lichess boards, I will leave it to you to try to find in which categories my mistakes (and my opponent's mistakes) can be classified under. Message me if you want to see the annotations I have created for this game.

There is obviously much more you can do to correct your past mistakes, however, I strongly suggest you start off by sticking to the system I have recommended. Get into the habit of doing these 4 things, and slowly build off from there. As you can see, analyzing your games is not a trivial process, and normally analyzing each game should take between 1-3 hours for the maximum benefit.
Thank you for doing these posts. I have learned a great deal from them.
@TitleKiller:

I think you are totally right that analyzing your games is a great way to improve your playing strength.

But if you are analyzing for 1-3 hours and the game itself lasted 30 minutes, this is some kind of disproportion.

I analyze my tournament games (at least the interesting ones) but not my short online games. Even rapid games are bit too short to analyze it deeply. You have no real time to develop deep ideas and so there is normally not much to analyze except tactical mistakes and opening variations.

Instead of analyzing your own short games it would probably be more effective to analyze commented grandmaster games. This helped me allot to learn strategical ideas and how to create a good plan in my own games.

Best wishes
Nada
Nada

You make a valid point in that it isn't vital to spend 1-3 hours analyzing online games. The online game I provided was merely a reference for how you should analyze games that take a longer period of time to play.

That being said, I strongly suggest you analyze your tournament games (even the ones that are not interesting) because you may have to go into similar positions in the future.

Analyzing grandmaster games is one of the best ways to improve, and there are various articles out there about how to play solitaire chess with the grandmaster games. However, when you analyze grandmaster games, you are entering the mind of someone else, and trying to guess what they did. Some benefit can be obtained from this, however, it is also to analyze ideas that your own mind was focused on.

Ultimately, everyone looks at certain positions differently, and it is optimal that you strengthen the way you look at such positions. Analyzing your own games to a greater extent will give you the ability to hone in on your own weaknesses, and improve much faster.

I wish you the best of luck in your chess endeavors.
@TitleKiller,

thanks for this advice, its always hard to look at those games from which you know you played them in a bad way but if you manage to analyze them although they are terribly played this would probably be the best way to improve - but this is the hardest task! How much easier it is to look at nice wins and enjoy them all day long. Of course this is also important to keep your motivation upright but should not be the only thing you do to become a better player! ;-)

Best luck to you as well!

Best wishes
Nada

Play longer time controls. If your a calculator it will help u calculate longer possible lines. It all about finding your groove and sticking to it. What ever you think is more fun for you man!

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.