@ConfianceRompue said in #9:
> He made a normal number of blunders for someone of his rating, because he didn't cheat, unlike some others.
Any evidence besides gut feeling?
@Autofill said in #11:
> Any evidence besides gut feeling?
Cheatism has too many supporters.
@ConfianceRompue said in #12:
> Cheatism has too many supporters.
Thats not evidence
@ConfianceRompue said in #14:
> Evidence of what ?
Your claim, many people cheating
Around six days ago I started to play a bunch of unrated games. I am rated 2016 in blitz and around 1850 in rapid.
In a series of 14 unrated blitz games I played only against players above 2000, and their avarage rating (sum rating divided by 14 games) were 2164. Of those 14 I won 12, drew 1 and lost 1. I even won over players above 2300.
What I find a bit strange is that I very, very often have a very hard time when playing rated blitz/rapid games against players from 1600-1900, But that it somehow was quite easy to win over many players between 2100-2365 in unrated blitz (3+2) .
That is a bit strange I think. What it means I don’t know.
Have a Nice day, and wish you all peace and love.
@Lars-trygve said in #16:
> What it means I don’t know.
This is my current hypothesis, which I don't have much data to support. I believe some new users (or at least new accounts) take advantage of the wild provisional rating swings to stop when the rating is very high -- much higher than actual strength. Then, they play only unrated games to keep the stat.
@InModeration said in #7:
> 94% accuracy means nothing on its own. I've had 98% accuracy twice in the last few days and it's not a sign that I was cheating or even playing very well. My opponent blundered, it's as simple as that.
eah, but u might have cheated against those robots.
@C-Bear said in #1:
> I have played so many cheaters here the past few days.
In the last 6 months you have reported only one account for fair play reasons. The same account was also reported for inappropriate username. What I can say publicly is that the account is closed.
I don't see any other report for fair play in your history. Please use
lichess.org/report.
@C-Bear said in #3:
> You make a couple of assumptions.
Like you. You're just making assumptions here, too. And the level of accuracy is not a basis for assuming cheats here. Can you substantiate your assumptions? And I don't mean accuracy.
